<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Global IP Scorecards (TM)</title>
			<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards</link>
			<description>
			Duncan Bucknell's Global IP Scorecards
			</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 09:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<generator>StressLimitDesign blog/cast engine</generator>
			<copyright>&#x2117; &amp; &#xA9; 2008 Duncan Bucknell</copyright>
			<managingEditor>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan Bucknell)</managingEditor>
			<category>Global IP Strategy</category>
			<webMaster>colin@stresslimitdesign.com (Colin Vernon)</webMaster>
			<item>
				<title>Nintendo Company Ltd</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/388</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/388</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:17:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				This scorecard tracks intellectual property events relevant to the <a href="http://www.nintendo.com">Nintendo Company</a> around the globe.&nbsp; You find out more about Nintendo at their <a href="http://www.nintendo.com">website</a>, or on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo">Wikipedia</a>.
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Hillcrest files patent infringement suit against Nintendo over
Wii video game machines and remote controllers: (<a href="http://www.marylandiplaw.com/2008/08/articles/patents/hillcrest-labs-sues-nintendo-and-its-wii-video-game">Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Hillcrest lodges complaints against Nintendo in federal court
and with the International Trade Commission, claiming its Wii video game
infringes four patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66771">Law360</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080820/1241462048.shtml">Techdirt</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Nintendo appeals $21M judgment that its GameCube and Wii
controller infringes Anascape&#8217;s patent: (<a href="http://www.patracer.com/the_patent_litigation_blo/2008/08/wii-canascape-2.html">Patent Appeal Tracer</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>JAPAN: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Nintendo bringing suit against makers of DS carts which can be used in piracy: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080730-nintendo-no-friend-of-homebrew-market-sues-ds-cart-makers.html">Ars Technica</a>)
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Judge enjoins Nintendo from selling GameCube and
Wii controllers in patent battle against Anascape: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=63652&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=63652">IP
Law360</a>)								</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Judge again upholds $21M verdict against Nintendo: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=63107&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=63107">IP
Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Motion for remittitur denied in patent
infringement case between Anascape and Nintendo: (<a href="http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/2008/07/motion-for-remittitur-denied-in-anascape-v-nintendo.html">EDTexweblog.com</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>John R Martin files patent infringement
suit against Nintendo over DS touch screen: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080707-patent-infringement-lawsuit-targets-nintendo-ds-touch-screen.html">Ars
Technica</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>No reduction in $21M damages
awarded to Anascape, no new trial for Nintendo in patent suit over GameCube,
Wii controllers: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60614&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60614">IP
Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Nintendo sues Nyko for
trade mark and patent infringement relating to videogame controls: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59180&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59180">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/06/nunchucked.html">Patent
Prospector</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Nintendo loses
patent suit over 3D controller; Anascape awarded $21M in damages: motion for
remittitur filed: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080515/1853171129.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://dailydoseofip.blogspot.com/2008/05/anascape-obtains-21m-patent.html">Daily
Dose of IP</a>), (<a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=9124">Out-Law</a>),
(<a href="http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/2008/05/nintendo-verdict-motion-for-remittitur-filed.html">EDTexweblog.com</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Nintendo hit with $21M infringement
     verdict in Anascape case: (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/05/nintendo-whacked-with-21-million.html">IPBiz</a>),&nbsp;
     (<a href="http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/2008/05/patent-verdict.html">EDTexweblog.com</a>),
     (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=56425&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=56425">IP
     Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Anascape Ltd.,
     Microsoft Corp. and Nintendo Inc - Markman claim construction handed down:
     (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Secure/ViewArticle.aspx?id=41428">IPLaw360</a>)
     </p>

<h3>CHINA: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>What Global Players could
     learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (<a href="http://ipdragon.blogspot.com/2007/12/blog-post.html">IPDragon</a>),
     (<a href="http://www.chinalawblog.com/2007/12/how_to_stay_ahead_of_china_cou.html">China
     Law Blog</a>) </p>



				]]></description>
				<author>kate@duncanbucknell.com (Kate)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>The Coca Cola Company</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/387</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/387</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:12:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				This scorecard tracks global intellectual property events relevant to the <a href="http://www.coca-cola.com.au/csol/">Coca Cola Company</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp; You can read more about them at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola">wikipedia entry</a>.
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Blue Springs Water Co
files trade mark infringement suit against Coca-Cola inChicago;<strong>&nbsp; </strong>Georgia
judge sides with Coca-Cola in related suit: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=64016">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Coke files DJ suit in
order to stop BlueSprings Water Co and its president from commencing IP
infringement suit: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60702&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60702">IP
Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Coca-Cola opposition to San Polo&#8217;s
application for CTM registration of MEZZOPANE fails again: (<a href="http://ice-ip.blogspot.com/2008/06/david-vs-goliath-david-wins-again.html">Catch
Us If You Can!!!</a>)</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Wines are different, CFI tells
Coke: The Coca-Cola Company v OHIM, San Polo Srl: (<a href="http://class46.blogspot.com/2008/06/wines-are-different-cfi-tells-coke.html">Class
46</a>)</p>

<h3>ESTONIA: Kate</h3><h5>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Estonian Board of Appeal finds
FANTASTIKA not likely to be confused with FANTA: <em>Coca-Cola
Co v Cido Partikas Grupa SIA</em>: (<a href="http://class46.blogspot.com/2008/06/fantastika-not-likely-to-be-confused.html">Class
46</a>)</p>

<h3>JAPAN: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Intellectual Property High Court of
Japan issues decision recognising Coca-Cola bottle as three-dimensional trade
mark: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58327&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58327">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.managingip.com/Article/1941637/Coca-Cola-wins-3D-bottle-battle-in-Japan.html">Managing
Intellectual Property</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Coca-Cola Co &#8211; CAFC upholds conviction of
     former Coca-Cola secretary charged with conspiring to steal trade secrets
     for selling to PepsiCo: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=56039&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=56039">IP
     Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>INDIA: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>&#8216;Mazaa&#8217; trade mark trouble
     for Coca-Cola: (<a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/05/spicyip-tidbits-mazaa-trouble-for-coca.html">Spicy
     IP</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>kate@duncanbucknell.com (Kate)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lexapro / Cipralex - (Escitalopram)</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/380</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/380</guid>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:54:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escitalopram">Escitalopram </a>is the S enantiomer of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citalopram">Citalopram </a>- a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used to treat depression and anxiety.
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>AUSTRALIA: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Patent battle over
anti-depressants continues: <em>Alphapharm
Pty Ltd v Lundbeck A/S</em>: (<a href="http://www.internationallawoffice.com/Newsletters/Detail.aspx?g=f53c2932-1482-449a-8d3b-68d54f761c85">International
Law Office</a>),

								</p>

<h3>SOUTH AFRICA: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>&#8216;Clerical Errors&#8217; and Calvinball: a disappointment for Lundbeck (<a href="http://afro-ip.blogspot.com/2008/07/clerical-errors-and-calvinball.html">Afro-IP</a>),</p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>AU623144</strong> &#8211; Validity of patent upheld in the Federal Court of Australia on 24/04/08.&nbsp; Patent term slashed by 5 years after it was held that Lundbeck&#8217;s application for an extension of term was made outside the required time frame.&nbsp; Lundbeck issued a statement that it intends to appeal the decision. </p>


<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>EP0347066</strong> &#8211; Lundbeck won their appeal on 10/04/08.</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>USRE34712</strong> &#8211; The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision on 05/09/07. </p>


<h3>CANADA: Anonymous</h3><h5>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><em>Lundbeck v. Cobalt</em>
</p><p><strong>CA</strong><strong>1339452 &#8211; </strong>Prohibition Application against Cobalt. Hearing
scheduled Dec 15, 2008.								</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>US6703516</strong> &#8211; Forest filed an infringement suit against Infosint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on 19/07/07. </p>


<h3>UNITED STATES: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>US6458973</strong> &#8211; Forest filed an infringement suit against Infosint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on 19/07/07. </p>



<h3>CANADA: Anonymous</h3><h5>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><em>Lundbeck v.Apotex</em>
</p><p><strong>CA</strong><strong>1339452 &#8211; </strong>Prohibition Application against Apotex. Hearing
scheduled Dec 8, 2008. 								</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Sat, 05 May 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>EP0347066</strong> &#8211; Teva, Generics UK and Arrow sought to revoke three claims of the patent and were successful on two of the claims in a hearing in the UK Patents Court on 04/05/07.</p>

<h3>CANADA: Anonymous</h3><h5>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><em>Lundbeck v.Genpharm</em>
</p><p><strong>CA</strong><strong>1339452 &#8211; </strong>Prohibition Application against Genpharm.
Hearing scheduled Dec 1, 2008.								</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>EP0347066</strong> &#8211; Generics UK found not to infringe the patent in the UK Patents Court Chancery Division.&nbsp; Appeal by Lundbeck was dismissed on 02/08/06 in the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division). </p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>USRE34712</strong> &#8211; Validity upheld in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware upon challenge by IVAX on 13/07/06.</p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Sat, 20 May 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>AU623144</strong> &#8211; Direction handed down to amend the Patent Register in the Federal Court of Australia on 19/05/06, changing the expiry date to 09/12/12.</p>

<h3>CANADA: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>CA2049368</strong> &#8211; Lundbeck filed an Application for Order of prohibition until expiry of the patent against Apotex.&nbsp; Apotex alleged non-infringement.&nbsp; Application was dismissed on 12/11/03.</p>

<h3>CANADA: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 23:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>CA2353693</strong> &#8211; Lundbeck filed an Application for Order of prohibition until expiry of the patent against Genpharm on 05/11/03.&nbsp; Genpharm alleges non-infringement, invalidity and that the patent is not correctly listed on the Patent Register. </p>


<h3>CANADA: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Sat, 04 Oct 2003 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>CA2049368</strong> &#8211; Lundbeck filed an Application for Order of prohibition until expiry of the patent against Genpharm.&nbsp; Genpharm alleged non-infringement.&nbsp; Application was dismissed on 03/10/03.&nbsp;</p>

<h3>CANADA: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Sat, 04 Oct 2003 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>CA2049368</strong> &#8211; Genpharm&#8217;s motion to have the patent removed from the Patent Register was dismissed on 03/10/03.</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>info@genericsweb.com (GenericsWeb)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Document Security Systems v European Central Bank</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/345</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/345</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p><a href="http://www.documentsecurity.com/">Document Security Systems</a> has taken on the <a href="http://www.ecb.int/home/html/index.en.html">European Central Bank </a>in a patent dispute which highlights jurisdictional differences in infringement and added subject matter across Europe.</p>
<p>This scorecard tracks the dispute and its implications for European patent harmonisation and jurisprudence.<br /></p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Court of Appeal upholds Patents High Court ruling that patent is invalid for added subject matter.</p><p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/192.html">European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Incorporated </a><a title="Link to bailii version" href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/192.html">[2008] EWCA Civ 192</a> </p>

<h3>NETHERLANDS: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>District Court of the Hague holds patent valid, all grounds of invalidity dismissed.</p>
<p>Link to the case (courtesy of <a href="http://www.book9.nl/">Book9.nl</a>) <br /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.book9.nl/getobject.aspx?id=4629">European Central Bank v Document Security Systems, Inc. (12 March 2008), 269923 / HA ZA 06-2495</a><br /></p>

<h3>ITALY: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>First of invalidity proceedings hearing dates.</p>

<h3>FRANCE: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Le Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (troisieme chambre) nullifies DSS's patent because of added subject matter.</p>

<h3>NETHERLANDS: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Revocation proceedings hearing.</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Court of First Istance declares DSS's claims for patent infringement inadmissible and dismisses them in all respects.  The Court considered that only National Courts have authority to take notice of patent infringement claims.&nbsp; <a href="http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62005B0295:EN:HTML">DSS v ECB Case T&#8209;295/05</a></p>

<h3>FRANCE: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Nullity proceedings hearing.</p>

<h3>GERMANY: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Bundespatentgericht upholds validity of patent. &nbsp;No added subject matter and invention is new and inventive in all other respects.</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>DSS's patent revoked by UK Patents High Court for added subject matter.  Otherwise held to be novel and not obvious.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2007/600.html">European Central Bank v Document Security Systems, Inc. [2007] EWHC 600 (Pat)</a></p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Revocation proceedings trial ends.</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in the United Kingdom.</p>

<h3>LUXEMBOURG: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in Luxembourg.</p>

<h3>NETHERLANDS: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in the Netherlands.</p>

<h3>BELGIUM: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in Belgium.</p>

<h3>FRANCE: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in France.</p>

<h3>SPAIN: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in Spain.</p>

<h3>AUSTRIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in Austria.</p>

<h3>GERMANY: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in Germany.</p>

<h3>ITALY: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>European Central Bank files revocation action in Italy.</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>The European Central Bank challenges venue before the Court of First Instance.</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>DSS summoned ECB to appear in the Court of First Instance asserting that production of Euro bank notes infringes DSS's European Patent EP0455750.</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Perindopril (Coversyl)</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/333</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/333</guid>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perindopril">Perindopril </a>is a long-acting ACE (angiotension converting enzyme) inhibitor marked by Servier.</p>
<p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property events relevant to Perindoprili around the world.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>CANADA: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Trial judge finds Perindopril patent valid and infringed: <em>Laboratoires Servier v Apotex</em>: (<a href="http://www.gowlings.com/resources/enewsletters/pharmacapsules/HtmFiles/V7N09_20080731.en.html">Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>UK Court of Appeal affirms invalidity of Perindopril beta polymorph patent. &nbsp;Senior appellate Judges are critical of the use of the patent to seek monopoly extension: (copy of decision in <a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/445.html">Bailii</a>).</p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Australian Federal Court finds Servier engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act in relation to marketing of Coversyl:&nbsp;</p><p><em>Apotex Pty Ltd (formerly GenRx Pty Limited) v Les Laboratoires Servier (No 2)</em>: (<a href="http://iproo.blogspot.com/2008/05/pharmaceuticals-and-section-52.html">IPRoo</a>),</p>

<h3>CANADA: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Canada: Judicial
review of Minister&#8217;s decision regarding bioavailability comparison: <em>Apotex v Canada (Minister of Health) &amp;
Servier</em>: (<a href="http://www.gowlings.com/resources/enewsletters/pharmacapsules/HtmFiles/V7N05_20080508.en.html#a">Pharmacapsules@Gowlings</a>),</p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Perindopril polymorph opposition dismissed: <em>Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd</em>: (<a href="http://iproo.blogspot.com/2008/04/dismissed-opposition-perindopril.html">IPRoo</a>),</p>

<h3>CANADA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Court quashes 6 subpoenas, lets final one stand on limited basis,
subpoenas related to inventorship, conspiracy and claim correction: <em>Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex</em>: (<a href="http://www.gowlings.com/resources/enewsletters/pharmacapsules/HtmFiles/V7N04_20080421.en.html">Gowlings</a>),</p>

<h3>FRANCE: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Servier acquires several more synthetic process patent families from Lupin in 20 million Euro deal: (<a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2007/10/12/afx4213282.html">Forbes ;</a>&nbsp; <a href="http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage_c_online.php?leftnm=11&amp;bKeyFlag=IN&amp;autono=28683">Business Standard</a>)</p>

<h3>FRANCE: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Servier acquires several synthetic process patents from Lupin.</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shape or 3 Dimensional Trade Marks</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/332</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/332</guid>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Shape / 3D trade marks are controversial and an area of great interest but uncertainty to brand owners around the world.</p>
<p>This scorecard tracks the developments in shape / 3D trade marks across the globe.<br /></p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Kate</h3><h5>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Court finds no
likelihood of confusion in <em>Whirlpool v
Kenwood </em>3D trade mark dispute regarding the shape of kitchen mixers: (<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/08/protecting-shape-marks-court-mixes-in.html">IPKat</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>JAPAN: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Japan allows Coke bottle to be registered as 3D trade mark: (<a href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2008/07/01/japan-allows-coke-bottle-to-be-registered-as-a-3d-trademark">The
IP Factor</a>)</p>

<h3>CHINA: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Pfizer loses trade mark action against Jaingsu
Lianhuan Pharmaceutical Co over 3D mark: (<a href="http://www.iprights.com/cms/templates/chinaipx.aspx?articleid=3858&amp;zoneid=4">Rouse
&amp; Co International)</a></p>

<h3>CHINA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Examination of 3D marks in China by Wang Ze:
(<a href="http://ipdragon.blogspot.com/2008/05/examination-of-three-dimensional-marks.html">IP
Dragon</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>JAPAN: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Intellectual Property High Court of
Japan issues decision recognising Coca-Cola bottle as three-dimensional trade
mark: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58327&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58327">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.managingip.com/Article/1941637/Coca-Cola-wins-3D-bottle-battle-in-Japan.html">Managing
Intellectual Property</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p></p><p>Australian Federal Court delivers comprehensive judgment on goods or shape of goods as trade mark and functionality: <em>Global Brand Marketing Inc v YD Pty Ltd</em>:
(<a href="http://iproo.blogspot.com/2008/05/goods-or-shape-of-goods-as-trade-mark.html">IPRoo</a>)<strong></strong></p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal Court hands down decision regarding registrability of shape marks, finding mark registrable but not infringed: <em><br /></em></p><p><em>Global Branding Marketing Inc v YD Pty Ltd</em>: (<a href="http://www.australiantrademarkslawblog.com/2008/05/articles/unconventional-trade-marks/shoe-shape-marks-ship-shape">Australian Trade Marks Law Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>ISRAEL: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Israel Patent Office issues
guidance on 3D trade marks: (<a href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2008/05/04/israel-patent-office-issues-guidance-on-3d-trademarks">The
IP Factor</a>),

			</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Acacia Technologies Group</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/322</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/322</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Here's a blurb from Acacia's <a href="http://www.acaciatechnologies.com/aboutus_main.htm">website</a>:</p>
<p>&quot;Acacia Research's subisidiaries are in the business                of acquiring, developing, licensing and enforcing patents. We help                patent holders protect their patented inventions from unauthorized                use and generate revenue from licensing and, if necessary, enforcing                their patents. Our clients are primarily individual inventors and                small companies with limited resources to deal with unauthorized                users but include some large companies wanting to generate revenues                from their patented technologies.&quot;</p>
<p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property events relating to Acacia around the globe.<br /></p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>WineCommune settles Acacia unit&#8217;s
patent suit over patent related to guaranteed or bonded online auctions: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66392">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia subsidiary Digital Security Systems files lawsuit against 18 electronic giants including Samsung and Sharp over alleged infringement of patented technology in Blu-Ray Disc players: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65913">Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/08/blue_ray.html">Patent Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=484">Innovationpartners</a>)
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia unit International Printer Corp settles copier patent claims with Toshiba: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=64702">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Epson, Panasonic, others settle patent suit filed by Acacia subsidiary: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=63737">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia unit,
Hospital Systems Corp, settles patent claims with Siemens Medical Solutions: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60415&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60415">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Cognex
files defamation action against VCode Holdings (aka Acacia) over the company&#8217;s
conduct during patent dispute: (<a href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/06/company-files-defamation-action-against.html">Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Patent asserted by Acacia and Veritec covering a type of scanner found to be invalid in case brought against Cognex: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=56955&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=56955">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/05/cognex-whips-acacia-veritec-in-patent.html">IPBiz</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Multidistrict litigation created for photo-printing patent suits brought by Acacia against several camera manufacturers: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=52847&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=52847">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia settles with SAS Institute, Quest Software, Aspen Technology, BMC
Software, and F-Secure over patent dispute relating to rule-based monitoring
technology used in computer systems: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=51197&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=51197">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia Research Group settles patent infringement suit against AOL over technology that displays background images in instant messages and emails: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=50820&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=50820">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Patent Office agrees to
reexamine Acacia JPEG patent: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080310/012214486.shtml">Techdirt</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia&nbsp;settles lawsuit filed against Trend Micro for alleged
infringement of intellectual property covering CDs or DVDs that include
internet hyperlinks: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=48915&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=48915">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia subsidiary Restricted Spending Solutions files patent infringement
lawsuit against Apple over iTunes allowances: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/02/08/company-claims-patent-infringement-over-itunes-allowances">Ars
Technica</a>), (<a href="http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/02/acacia-sues-apple-over-itunes-in-east.html">Patent
Troll Tracker</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080212/021104237.shtml">Techdirt</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia unit
     drops claims against Verizon Wireless, the last remaining defendant in its
     patent infringement case over technology for transferring address data: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=43370&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=43370">IP
     Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia reaches
     settlement with Sharper Image: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Secure/ViewArticle.aspx?id=41375">IPLaw360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia sues Google for patent infringement: (<a href="http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2007/11/friday-patent-litigation-news.html">Patent Troll Tracker</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia loses patent case against Microsoft - in Texas: (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/11/acacia-loses-patent-case-in-texas.html">IPBiz</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Secure/ViewArticle.aspx?id=40354">IPLaw360</a>) , (<a href="http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/2007/11/verdict-for-mic.html">Eastern District of Texas</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2007/11/19/microsoft-win-in-patent-suit-against-acacia-a-victory-for-obviousness">arstechnica</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Time Warner</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/317</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/317</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:02:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Time Warner is the world's largest media and entertainment corporation, headquartered in the USA, with major operations in film, television, publishing, <span class="mw-redirect">Internet service</span> and telecommunications.&nbsp; Its subsidiaries include AOL, New Line Cinema, Time Inc., Time Warner Cable, HBO, Turner Broadcasting System, The CW Television Network, <span class="mw-redirect">Warner Bros. Entertainment</span>, Cartoon Network, CNN, and DC Comics. <br /></p>
<p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property events involving Time Warner around the globe.<br /></p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Twombly and patent pleadings in the
Eastern District of Texas: <em>FotoMedia Technologies v AOL</em>: (<a href="http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/2008/08/twombly-and-patent-pleadings-in-the-eastern-district-of-texas.html">EDTexweblog.com</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Time Inc., Hearst Corp. and others file copyright infringement
suit against owners and web hosts for Mygazines, which allows users to upload
and share print publications: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=67183">Law360</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>INDIA: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Bombay High Court: Warner Bros sues Mirchi
Movies for IPR violations over movie titled &#8216;Hari Puttar &#8211; A Comedy of
Terrors&#8217;: (<a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/08/spicyip-tidbit-hari-puttar-in-trouble.html">Spicy
IP</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080825/2350112096.shtml">Techdirt</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>AOL settles with Beneficial Innovations in suit that
accuses several major media companies of infringing patent covering interactive
online advertising systems: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66738">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal
judge refuses to dismiss 20thCentury Fox&#8217; lawsuit against Warner
Bros over rights to the novel &#8216;Watchmen&#8217;: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66541">Law360</a>),
(<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080819/1729302035.shtml">Techdirt</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Warner Music complains that Rock Band and Guitar Hero need to pay more for music: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080807/1025451922.shtml">Techdirt</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Cartoon Network &#8211; CAFC rules Cablevision&#8217;s remote DVD system did not violate copyright law: <em>Cartoon Network v CSC Holdings</em>: (<a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2008/08/dvr_as_a_servic.htm">Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog</a>), (<a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1695">Public Knowledge</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080804/1218551884.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080804-cablevision-wins-on-appeal-remote-dvr-lawful-after-all.html">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1697">Public Knowledge</a>), (<a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/victory-dvrs-cloud">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a>), (<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/08/text_of_decisio_5.html">The Trademark Blog</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=64984">Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/3263/196/">Michael Geist</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65292">Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1699">Public Knowledge</a>), (<a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1700">Public Knowledge</a>)
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Fame factor fuels victory in TTAB 2(d) opposition against &#8216;ROAD RUNNER&#8217; for batteries: <em>Time Warner Entertainment Co LP v Fleet Wholesale Supply Co</em>: (<a href="http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2008/07/fame-factor-fuels-victory-in-ttab-2d.html">TTABlog</a>)</p>

<h3>SWEDEN: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Cop on payroll of Warner Bros during criminal investigation of Pirate Bay: (<a href="http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=39">The Gray Blog</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Aloft
sues Yahoo, AT&amp;T, AOL over browser patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60428&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60428">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>RIAA drops <em>Warner v Cassin</em>, replaces it with <em>Warner v Does 1-4</em> assigned to different judge: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080615/2208091411.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080613-third-times-the-charm-riaa-tries-end-run-around-old-case.html">Ars
Technica</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Vtran&#8217;s
10 lawsuits over two video-on-demand patents against 22 cable industry
defendants including Time Warner, Comcast and Verizon have been consolidated
into single multidistrict litigation: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59186&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59186">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>SWEDEN: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Warner Music admits it hired police investigator before Pirate Bay
investigation complete: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080605/1646031320.shtml">Techdirt</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>District
Court tells Yahoo, AOL, RealNetworks they owe millions in royalties to songwriters
for online music streaming: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080501/020611996.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080501-judge-big-webcasters-owe-songwriters-millions-in-royalties.html">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54834&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54834">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Bascom
Global Internet Service files patent suit against Yahoo, AOL over parental
controls: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54829&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54829">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Heirs of Superman&#8217;s creator Jerome Siegel win share of copyright with Time Warner: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=51568&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=51568">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/04/is-it-bird-is-it-plane-noits-judge.html">IPKat</a>), (<a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1497">Public Knowledge</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Warner Music backs ISP surcharge for music-sharing: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080328/012123680.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1487">Public Knowledge</a>), (<a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2008/03/27/warner-music-hires-jim-griffin">A Copyfighter&#8217;s Musings</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080328-warner-music-floats-isp-surcharge-idea-for-unlimited-p2p-music.html">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2789/196">Michael Geist</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia Research Group settles patent infringement suit against AOL over
technology that displays background images in instant messages and emails: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=50820&ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=50820">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>CAFC affirms lower court&#8217;s summary
judgment against David Sitrick in his patent infringement case against
DreamWorks and Warner Bros - CAFC continues to expand doctrine of full scope
enablement: (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/voiceover.html">Patent
Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/enablement-cont.html">Patently-O</a>),
(<a href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/02/lack-of-enablement-for-movie-species.html">IP
Updates</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Time Warner, Comcast Cleared In VOD
     Patent Suit: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Secure/ViewArticle.aspx?id=42041">IPLaw360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Altitude Capital Partners sues Google, Yahoo, AOL and others: (<a href="http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2007/11/altitude-capital-partners-hiding-behind.html">Patent Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Secure/ViewArticle.aspx?id=40840">IPLaw360</a>),</p>

<h3>INDIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Delhi High Court dismissed a petition by J K Rowling and Warner Brothers against a Durga Puja pandal in Kolkata's Salt Lake area allegedly replicating Hogwarts Castle. (<a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2007/10/potter-troubles-over-for-puja.html">Spicy IP</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Wal-Mart</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/316</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/316</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. runs a chain of discount department stores. It is the world's largest public corporation by revenue, according to the 2007 Fortune Global 500.</p>
<p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property events relevant to Wal-Mart.<br /> </p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Wal-Mart settles with
Adidas in case over three-stipes trade mark: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=68160">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Gibson Guitar&#8216;s patent suit against Wal-Mart Stores over
&#8216;Guitar Hero&#8217; video games stayed pending outcome of similar case in California
and reexam of patent: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65867">Law360</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Attorney&#8217;s fees denied to prevailing defendants Ramones band members, Wal-Mart and Realnetworks in copyright case with Richard Reinhardt (pka Richie Ramone): (<a href="http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2008/07/richie-ramone-and-attorneys-fees.html">Patry Copyright Blog</a>), 
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Adidas
sues Wal-Mart for trade mark infringement over striped shoes: (<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/06/adidas_sues_wal.html">The Trademark Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:39:00 -0500</h5><p>Patentee
RFID appeals from summary judgment of noninfringement based on Judge Davis&#8217;
order on claim construction: (<a href="http://www.patracer.com/the_patent_litigation_blo/2008/06/2008-1412-rfid.html">Patent Appeal Tracer</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Sun, 18 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Ex-Ramones&#8217;
drummer&#8217;s copyright infringement case against Wal-Mart, Apple and others fails:
(<a href="http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2008/05/ramones-and-wal-mart.html">Patry Copyright Blog</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Express sues Wal-Mart for trade mark infringement over &#8216;Express For Less&#8217; tagline: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=56407&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=56407">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Wal-Mart
learns painful copyright lesson: Flagler Productions, contracted to film
Wal-Mart employees, releases videos to public: (<a href="http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2008/04/wal-mart-learns-painful-copyright.html">Patry Copyright Blog</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080410/134138812.shtml">Techdirt</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Court rejects Wal-Mart&#8217;s trade mark infringement claims against Charles Smith
over use of phrases including &#8216;walocaust&#8217; and &#8216;wal-qaeda&#8217; on parody t-shirts
and bumper stickers: (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080323/142855.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=51206&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=51206">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Oke K Nilssen&#8217;s fluorescent-light patent suit against retailers including
Costco Wholesale Corp, Ikea, Wal-Mart Stores and Home Depot dismissed for
inequitable conduct: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=50626&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=50626">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Ducan</h3><h5>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Amazon &amp; Wal-Mart
     unwittingly team up against DRM: (<a href="http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/BAaf/~3/194100269/20071202-amazon-and-wal-mart-unwittingly-team-up-against-drm.html">ArsTechnica</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Ducan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Plavix (Clopidogrel)</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/275</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/275</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Plavix (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clopidogrel">Clopidogrel</a>) is one of the world's biggest selling drugs.  It is marketed by Bristol Myers Squibb and is a potent antiplatelet agent used for coronary arterial disease and other vascular diseases.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>AUSTRALIA: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Enantiomer claims fail;
salt claims stand: <em>Apotex v
Sanofi-Aventis</em>: (<a href="http://www.australianpatentlaw.com/2008/08/gyles-j-takes-aim-at-enabling.html">Australia
&amp; New Zealand Intellectual Property Law</a>)

								</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal judge denies Bristol-Myers
Squibb&#8217;s motion to dismiss securities class action over BMS&#8217; failure to
properly disclose generic Plavix patent deal: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66787">Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Adam Trumble</h3><h5>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:16:00 -0500</h5><p>There has been a decision in Australia - see the link provided.</p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Plavix patent survives
revocation proceedings: <em>Apotex v
Sanofi-Aventis</em>: (<a href="http://www.australianpatentlaw.com/2008/08/worlds-second-biggest-selling-drug.html">Australia
&amp; New Zealand Intellectual Property Law</a>)

								</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Former Bristol-Myers Squibb Vice-President
charged with lying to federal government about Plavix patent deal: (<a href="http://www.genericsweb.com/index.php?action_handler=news">GenericsWeb</a>),
(<a href="http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/2008/08/fdli-update-art.html">FDA
Law Blog</a>)</p>

<h3>GERMANY: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Sanofi-Aventis to appeal German court decision to immediately authorise marketing of generic Plavix: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=64264">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>GERMANY: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Difficult to predict when generic Plavix can be launched in Germany after suspended approval: (<a href="http://www.genericsweb.com/index.php?action_handler=news">GenericsWeb</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=62831&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=62831">IP Law360</a>),</p>


<h3>UNITED STATES: Anonymous</h3><h5>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Former Bristol-Myers
Squibb VP indicted for lying about Plavix patent deal: (<a href="http://www.smartbrief.com/news/BIO/industryPR-detail.jsp?id=05239297-CE7B-4BCC-8915-AD53492ADBF7&amp;sb_code=RSS&amp;i=Generic Drugs">SmartBrief</a>),
(<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/former-bms-vp-bodnar-indicted-for-lying.html">IPBiz</a>),
(<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54092&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54092">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.genericsweb.com/index.php?action_handler=news">GenericsWeb</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apotex sues FDA to recover 180-day exclusivity
on generic Plavix: (<a href="http://www.orangebookblog.com/2008/04/apotes-sues-fda.html">Orange Book
Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>THAILAND: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Sanofi in negotiations with Thai government to
prevent Cadila from obtaining a compulsory licence to market generic
clopidogrel in Thailand: (<a href="http://genericpharmaceuticals.blogspot.com/2008/03/thailand-clopidogrel-story-takes-more.html">Generic
Pharmaceuticals &amp; IP</a>), (<a href="http://www.genericsweb.com/index.php?action_handler=news">GenericsWeb</a>),</p>

<h3>INDIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Sanofi threatens Cadila and BioScience with suit
over supply of generic Plavix despite compulsory licence issued by&nbsp;Thailand: (<a href="http://genericpharmaceuticals.blogspot.com/2008/02/thailand-sanofi-still-arm-twisting.html">Generic
Pharmaceuticals &amp; IP</a>),</p>

<h3>CANADA: Anonymous</h3><h5>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Leave to appeal to Supreme Court of Canada 
filed by Apotex and granted, July 5 2007 (Docket #31881): The issues are &#8220;test 
for obviousness&#8221; and the &#8220;doctrine of selection patents&#8221;. The prior art CA&#8217;875 
patent claimed a racemate, and two enantiomers. The question is whether 
Sanofi-Synthelabo was entitled to a second patent, the CA&#8217;777 patent. Tentative 
hearing date: April 16, 08. </p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>A permanent injunction was granted 
in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in June 
2007.</p>

<h3>CANADA: Anonymous</h3><h5>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apotex filed a motion to appeal the earlier prohibition order. The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Apotex&#8217;s appeal, Dec 22, 
2006 (2006 FCA 421): The FCA held it is non-obvious to isolate clopidogrel, an 
enantiomer, from a known racemate, although it was uncontested that methods of 
separating and testing the enantiomers were known. The FCA held that the 
CA1336777 was a valid selection patent in that it &#8220;selected&#8221; the enantiomer from 
a known genus (CA1194875). </p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>The United States Court of Appeals 
for the Federal Circuit upheld preliminary injunction against Apotex issued by the United States District Court for the 
Southern District of New York on 08/12/06.&nbsp; 
The injunction ordered Apotex to halt its sales 
of a generic version of clopidogrel bisulfate pending the District Court's decision in the trial 
on the merits.&nbsp; </p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: GenericsWeb</h3><h5>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>EP0281459 - Aircoat withdrew a revocation action by 
which it had sought to invalidate the Sanofi 
patent.&nbsp; The matter was to take place in 
the Court of Session in Glasgow, Scotland. (<a href="http://en.sanofi-aventis.com/press/ppc_2583.asp">Sanofi Press release</a>)</p>

<h3>CANADA: Anonymous</h3><h5>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Prohibition against Apotex granted by the 
Federal Court March 21, 2005 (2005 FC 390). </p>

<h3>CANADA: Anonymous</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Sanofi-Aventis v. Apotex re. 
CA1336777 </p><p>Sanofi-Aventis 
filed an Application for a Prohibition Order against Apotex (i.e. prohibit the 
Minister of Health to issue the marketing authorization to Apotex), April 28, 
2003.</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>noreply@duncanbucknell.com (Anonymous)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Monsanto</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/270</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/270</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Monsanto is a multinational agricultural biotechnology company. This scorecard tracks IP events involving Monsanto around the globe.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Monsanto and Pilot Grove Coop
reach settlement of patent suit relating to Roundup Ready seed technology: (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/09/monsanto-and-pilot-grove-coop-reach-settlement.html">Philip
Brooks</a>), (<a href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/09/monsanto-announ.html">Patent
Docs</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><em>David v Monsanto</em> &#8211; Gene
sequence patent-eligibility: (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal Wegner</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><em>David v Monsanto</em>: Biotechnology patent &#8216;exhaustion&#8217; after <em>Quanta</em>, Supreme Court petition: (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal Wegner</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>According to &#8216;etc group&#8217; BASF, Monsanto, Bayer, Syngenta and DuPont have grabbed up &#8216;climate ready&#8217; genes: (<a href="http://patentmaze.cougarlaw.com/blawg/2008/08/08/are-climate-genes-grabbed-up-in-patents-of-the-gene-giants">Navigating the Patent Maze</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>North Carolina Farmers&#8217; Assistance
Fund sues Monsanto for false patent marking: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59514&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59514">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Monsanto, Syngenta settle patent and antitrust disputes over herbicide resistance and genetically modified soybean technology: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=57144&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=57144">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Supreme
Court petition for certiorari; &#8216;whether&#8230; process patent cannot be infringed under either 35 U.S.C. &#167; 271(a) or 35 U.S.C. &#167;
271(g) unless every step of the patented process is performed during the term
of the patent&#8217;: <em>Monsanto v Syngenta</em>:
(<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal Wegner</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Anonymous</h3><h5>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>CAFC orders Bayer Bioscience
to pay Monsanto&#8217;s attorneys fees due to Bayer&#8217;s inequitable conduct during
prosecution of transgenic corn patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54083&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54083">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/three_strikes.html">Patent
Prospector</a>),</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Cefetra BV<em>Monsanto
Technology LLC v </em>first national court referral to the ECJ on interpretation of Biotech
Directive: (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal
Wegner</a>)</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Limitations on the
scope of DNA patent claims in Europe: Monsanto struggles in its attempt to
block importation of soy meal: (<a href="http://holmansbiotechipblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/limitations-on-scope-of-dna-patent.html">Holman&#8217;s
Biotech IP Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Monsanto&#8217;s Roundup Ready
     GMO patents convincingly upheld on appeal in another case against a
     farmer: <em>Monsanto v David</em>: (<a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/monsantos-round.html">Patently-O</a>),
     (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/bad_seed.html">Patent
     Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Harold Wegner</a>),
     (<a href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/monsanto-co-v-d.html">Patent
     Docs</a>), (<a href="http://holmansbiotechipblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/federal-circuit-sides-with-monsanto-yet.html">Holman&#8217;s
     Biotech IP Blog</a>), (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/monsanto-whacks-farmer-david-at-cafc.html">IPBiz</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Monsanto's infamous Roundup ready patent, <a href="http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&amp;IDX=EP0546090&amp;CY=ep&amp;LG=en">EP0546090</a> valid but not infringed in the UK (<a href="http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2007/2257.html">Monsanto Technology LLC v Cargill International SA</a>).  (The patent has previously been the subject of much controversy, and had already been the target of anti-GM groups. (<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2007/10/monsanto-fail-to-round-up-any.html">IPKat</a>), (<a href="http://duncanbucknell.com/blog/164/Monsantos-costly-patent-strategy-mistake">IP Think Tank</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>USPTO rejects four key Monsanto patents related to genetically modified crops after Re-examination requested by the Public Patent Foundation: (<a href="http://www.pubpat.org/monsantorejections.htm">PubPat</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Fujitsu</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/266</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/266</guid>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Fujitsu is a Japanese company specializing in semiconductors, computers, telecommunications and services and is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.</p><p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property events involving Fujitsu around the globe.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Fujitsu and Nanya sign
licensing agreement ending three-year patent battle over DRAM chips: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=67910">Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal judge dismisses KLA-Tencor&#8217;s bid to invalidate method patent asserted by Fujitsu against Nanya Technology, ruling no controversy exists between KLA and Fujitsu: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65951">Law360</a>), 
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:54:00 -0500</h5><p>Tellabs
sues Fujitsu for wilful violation of optical communications patent: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59074&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59074">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Summary of Nanya Technology patent war against Fujitsu over DDR SDRAM chip technology: (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/05/punching_the_clock.html">Patent Prospector</a>),</p>

<h3>JAPAN: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Nanya drops appeal in DRAM suit against Fujitsu: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=56717&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=56717">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Judge stays Nanya Technology Corp&#8217;s declaratory
judgment counterclaims in DRAM patent infringement dispute with Fujitsu: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=52481&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=52481">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>KLA-Tencor challenges validity of
Fujitsu&#8217;s patent for methods of making semiconductor chips using advanced
optics: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=49683&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=49683">IP
Law360</a>),</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>IBM</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/265</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/265</guid>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) is a multinational computer technology and consulting corporation headquartered in Armonk, New York, USA. The company is one of the few information technology companies with a continuous history dating back to the 19th century</p><p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property events involving IBM around the Globe.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>IBM technical disclosure prior art database: (<a href="http://www.securinginnovation.com/2008/07/articles/defensive-publishing/ibm-technical-disclosures-prior-art-database">Securing Innovation</a>)
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Implicit Networks sues IBM, Oracle, SAP, Adobe and others alleging infringement of application server technology patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=62724&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=62724">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Ex-IBM employee pleads guilty to felony charge of stealing IBM&#8217;s trade secrets: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=62121&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=62121">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.securinginnovation.com/2008/07/articles/innovationq/exec-pleads-guilty-to-stealing-trade-secrets">Securing Innovation</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>IBM spells out position on business method patents in IAM exclusive: (<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=b71c3d0c-ddb1-4381-af15-778386e75686">IAM</a>),</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>IBM buys
mainframe rival Platform Solutions to end IP, antitrust disputes: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=61231&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=61231">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>IBM buys
mainframe rival Platform Solutions to end IP, antitrust disputes: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=61231&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=61231">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>IBM&#8217;s
Kappos says Big Blue is opposed to business method patents: (<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=a5667ec9-88a9-4ae4-8304-67190f4ffcfb">IAM</a>),</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Anonymous</h3><h5>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p></p><p>IBM&nbsp;faces EU competition scrutiny on mainframe business:
(<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=53935&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=53935">IP
Law360</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Asustek
Computer, which is being sued by IBM for patent infringement, has fired off its
own lawsuit claiming IBM is infringing its patents for remote storage and
modulized server technology: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=52278&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=52278">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/ibm-asustek-go-after-one-another.html">IPBiz</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Stephen Norris Capital Partners
finances reorganization of SCO and plans for SCO to pursue Novell/IBM
litigation aggressively despite the company&#8217;s earlier litigation failure: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080215-private-equity-firm-pours-100-million-into-sco-money-pit.html">Ars
Technica</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080214/185802258.shtml">Techdirt</a>),
(<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=47262&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=47262">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=566">Against
Monopoly</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>IBM and World Business Council for Sustainable Development Team
With Nokia, Pitney Bowes, and Sony to Establish Eco-Patent Commons: (<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=cb8c9a00-82c0-438a-a0d0-30f5b07e2ac3">IAM</a>), (<a href="http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release.do?id=809733&amp;sourceType=3">IBM press release</a>)

			</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Samsung</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/264</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/264</guid>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:35:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Samsung is South Korea's largest conglomerate 
and one of the largest multi-billion dollar corporations in the world
leading several major global industries. It is composed of numerous
multinational businesses, all united under the prestige <em>Samsung</em> brand, one of the most valued global brands, including Samsung Electronics, the world's largest electronics company,Samsung Heavy Industries, one of the world's biggest shipbuilders and Samsung Engineering &amp; Construction, a major global construction company.</p><p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property events involving Samsung around the globe.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal judge grants summary judgment in Rambus favour on three
of Samsung&#8217;s counterclaims that Rambus&#8217; former in-house counsel misappropriated
confidential information regarding memory chip patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66506">Law360</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia subsidiary Digital Security Systems files lawsuit against 18
electronic giants including Samsung and Sharp over alleged infringement of
patented technology in Blu-Ray Disc players: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65913">Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/08/blue_ray.html">Patent Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=484">Innovationpartners</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Rambus believes new Samsung DRAM products may infringe patents; asks judge to compel defendants to reveal information on new products: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65088">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Japan-based Atratech Japan Corp files patent infringement suit against flat-screen tv giants including Samsung, Vizio, LG and Mitsubishi claiming infringement of circuitry patent: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=64789">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal judge denies defendants requests for judgment of noninfringement based on claim construction in Rambus ongoing DRAM patent battle against Samsung, Hynix Semiconductor and others: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=62031&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=62031">IP Law360</a>), 
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>ITC staff
recommendation against granting injunctive relief in InterDigital&#8217;s action
against Samsung over cell phone patents; InterDigital share price tumbles: (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/07/disappointed_1.html">Patent Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=61574&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=61574">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=c2d709f2-a49c-4572-ab81-1f962aecba74">IAM</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Cheetah
Omni files patent infringement suit against Samsung Electronics, and Mitsubishi
Digital Electronics over digital light processing televisions: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=61168&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=61168">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>EZ4Media
files patent infringement suits against Samsung and Logitech over patents
involving wireless streaming of digital media: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=61025&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=61025">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Rambus,
Samsung spar over claims that Rambus&#8217; former in-house counsel misappropriated
confidential information regarding memory chip patents owned by Samsung: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60830&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60830">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Samsung sues Polaroid Corp and
Westinghouse Digital Electronics claiming their digital television products
infringe four of its patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59376&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59376">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Samsung sues Polaroid Corp and
Westinghouse Digital Electronics claiming their digital television products
infringe four of its patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59376&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59376">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Cisco and
Intel join WiMAX Open Patent Alliance with Samsung, Sprint Nextel,
Alcatel-Lucent and Clearwire: (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/patent-pool-in-wimax-area.html">IPBiz</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080609/0255371342.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58758&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58758">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Mitsumi
sues Samsung over disk drive patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58631&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58631">IP Law360</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Mitsubishi
Electric Corp, Samsung Electronics Co, Sony Corp, Philips Electronics and
others file suit against Vizio claiming its flat-panel TV infringes their
compression-standard technology patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58200&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58200">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Samsung Renesas settle DRAM infringement disputes: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=56827&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=56827">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Samsung
dealt another setback in Rambus patent disputes - Judge Ronald M. Whyte denied Samsung's motion for summary judgment that
its memory products did not infringe Rambus&#8217; series of patents in two
cases pending in the U.S. District Court: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54900&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54900">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>CAFC grants
Rambus final victory in semiconductor patent dispute with Samsung: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54621&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54621">IP Law360</a> ), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/to_naught.html">Patent Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal Wegner</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Judge
won&#8217;t toss Samsung DRAM patent suit against ON Semiconductor Corp: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=52391&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=52391">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Traffic navigation unit inventor Adamasu Gebre
sues Ford, General Motors and Samsung for patent infringement: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=52300&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=52300">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>ITC
begins investigation into whether numerous companies (including Hitachi, LG,
Lite-On, Matsushita, Motorola, Nokia, Pioneer, Samsung, Sanyo, Sharp, Sony,
Toshiba) infringed Dr G N Rothschild&#8217;s LED patents: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080323-led-patent-dispute-could-block-blu-ray-cellphones-imports.html">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080321/162722617.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/03/itc-investigate.html">Philip Brooks</a>), (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/03/non-producer-sues-thirty-defendants.html">IPBiz</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>E.Digital sues LG Electronics,
Nikon, Samsung Electronics and others for infringement of patents relating to
flash memory technology: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=49774&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=49774">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>ITC agrees to begin investigation
into patent infringement allegations filed by Sharp against Samsung, a month
after agreeing to consider similar claims by Samsung against Sharp: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=48638&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=48638">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>JAPAN: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Matsushita and Samsung
     have settled all ongoing patent infringement suits in the USA and Japan over semiconductor technology:
     (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=45724&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=45724">IPLaw360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Matsushita and Samsung
     have settled all ongoing patent infringement suits in the USA and Japan over semiconductor technology:
     (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=45724&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=45724">IPLaw360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Rambus has
     prevented its rivals from using the expression &#8216;patent troll&#8217; in its
     dynamic random access memory chip patent case against Hynix, Samsung,
     Nanya and Micron: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=45282&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=45282">IP
     Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/troll_this.html">Patent
     Prospector</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>ITC to
     investigate Samsung's claims that Japan-based Sharp Corp. and its U.S.
     subsidiaries are infringing LCD patents through the importation of
     televisions, laptops and cell phones: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=44999&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=44999">IP
     Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Samsung lodges a complaint with the U.S.
International Trade Commission against Renesas Technology, contending
that the Japanese chipmaker infringed on its patents for high-speed
dynamic random access memory chips.</p><p>(<a href="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/02/123_18278.html">Korea Times</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Apple</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/260</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/260</guid>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:21:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple </a>is an American multinational corporation which focuses on consumer electronics, software and entertainment.  This scorecard tracks intellectual property events involving Apple around the world.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Psystar responds to Apple&#8217;s copyright and trade mark lawsuit with
countersuit claiming that tying Mac OS to Mac hardware violates antitrust laws:
(<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080715-apple-finally-sues-unlicensed-macintosh-cloner-psystar.html">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=9384">Out-Law</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Psystar granted another two week filing extension
in copyright case brought by Apple: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/08/20/psystar-granted-another-two-week-filing-extension">Ars
Technica</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple lobbied US Patent Reform Act 2007, US and EU
copyright laws and more in second quarter: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/08/15/apple-lobbied-for-patent-reform-clean-energy-more-in-q2">Ars
Technica</a>) </p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple settles patent dispute with Digital Background Corp over iChat feature: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65172">Law360</a>)
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Psystar lawyers hint at antitrust filing against Apple: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/08/05/psystar-lawyers-hint-at-antitrust-filing-against-apple">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080805/0242481892.shtml">Techdirt</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Psystar retains law firm with past success against Apple to defend against claims of trade mark, copyright and licence violations: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/07/31/psystar-retains-law-firm-with-past-success-against-apple">Ars Technica</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Protective
order allows UMG, Napster, Apple and Yahoo to provide limited information about
operative agreements between them in copyright case brought by Bridgeport
Music: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60429&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60429">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Clear
with Computers files patent infringement suit against Apple and Hewlett-Packard
over custom configuration ordering systems: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/06/20/apple-hp-sued-over-custom-configuration-ordering-systems">Ars Technica</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><strong>Motorola launches trade secrets suit against former executive who left to work for Apple: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=63072&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=63072">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080718/1850451733.shtml">Techdirt</a>), 
</strong>


<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple files suit against Psystar alleging violation of shrick wrap licence, trade mark and copyright infringement: (<a href="http://espinosaiplaw.com/wordpress/?p=41">The Gray Blog</a>), 
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>After
finishing dispute with Cisco, Apple formally files trade mark application for
&#8216;iPhone&#8217; with USPTO: (<a href="http://ice-ip.blogspot.com/2008/07/iphone-news-from-uspto.html">Catch Us If You Can!!!</a>),</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>CFI rules goods can be similar even
if neither competing nor complementary: Case T-328/05 <em>Apple Computer v OHIM, TKS-Teknosoft</em>: (<a href="http://class46.blogspot.com/2008/07/goods-can-be-similar-even-if-neither.html">Class
46</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple,
Hewlett-Packard, Dell sued over computer systems patents by Saxon Innovations:
(<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60607&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60607">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Typhoon
adds 10 companies, including Apple, Nokia, and LG Electronics, to touch screen
patent suit: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60202&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60202">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/06/25/apple-and-host-of-others-added-to-touchscreen-patent-lawsuit">Ars Technica</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Clear
With Computers (formerly Orion IP) sues Apple and Hewlett-Packard over online
sales patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59641&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59641">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Klausner
Technology settles patent lawsuits against Apple and AT&amp;T over iPhone&#8217;s
visual voicemail feature: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/06/16/apple-and-att-pony-up-to-license-visual-voicemail-patents">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080616/2258471431.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59583&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59583">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>CANADA: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple
iTunes to offer downloadable movies in Canada &#8211; highlights issues of net
neutrality and DMCA: (<a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2996/196">Michael Geist</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Man &amp; Machine sues Apple and CBS alleging trade mark infringement related to use of &#8216;Mighty Mouse&#8217; trade mark: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/05/21/company-cheesed-off-at-apple-cbs-over-mighty-mouse-mark">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://ipdownunder.com/apple-and-cbs-trade-mark-infringement-suit-over-mighty-mouse">IP Down Under</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=57079&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=57079">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple sues iPod accessories maker Atico International for patent and trade mark infringement: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=56720&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=56720">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Anonymous</h3><h5>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p></p><p>UKApple threatens legal
action against 11 UK e-tailers unless they stop selling iPods imported from outside the&nbsp; : (<a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=9076">Out-Law</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Henry Milan files
patent suit against Apple over iPod connector: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54419&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54419">IP Law360</a>),&nbsp;(<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/04/apples-success.html">Philip Brooks</a>)<strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Ex-Ramones&#8217;
drummer&#8217;s copyright infringement case against Wal-Mart, Apple and others fails:
(<a href="http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2008/05/ramones-and-wal-mart.html">Patry Copyright Blog</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Anonymous</h3><h5>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Publication of Apple patent application for
&#8216;enhancing online shopping atmosphere&#8217; - troll-like?: (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/is-apple-computer-going-troll.html">IPBiz</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple challenges
NYC &amp; Co to trade mark logo for GreeNYC environmental campaign: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/04/04/apple-battling-new-york-city-environmental-logo">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://www.againstmonopoly.org/index.php?perm=634">Against Monopoly</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=52184&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=52184">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/04/text_of_notice.html">Trademark Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple
sued by Mirror Worlds over document streaming patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=50257&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=50257">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/03/20/apple-hit-with-time-machine-patent-infringement-lawsuit">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/03/patent-suit-against-apple-over-time.html">IPBiz</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p></p><p>ZapMedia
media files patent infringement suit against Apple over iTunes: (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/03/davids_against_goliaths.html">Patent
Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=49921&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=49921">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/03/14/apple-sued-over-ipod-and-itunes-technology-again">Ars
Technica</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080313/020827529.shtml">Techdirt</a>)<strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Acacia subsidiary 'Restricted
Spending Solutions' files patent infringement lawsuit against Apple over iTunes
allowances: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/02/08/company-claims-patent-infringement-over-itunes-allowances">Ars
Technica</a>), (<a href="http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/02/acacia-sues-apple-over-itunes-in-east.html">Patent
Troll Tracker</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080212/021104237.shtml">Techdirt</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Minerva asserts
     new patent relating to cellular technology against Apple and numerous
     others: (<a href="http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/01/minerva-v-rim-another-case-opened-too.html">Patent
     Troll Tracker</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=44821&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=44821">IP
     Law360</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/01/24/apple-hit-with-yet-another-iphone-patent-lawsuit">Ars
     Technica</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple settles
     video-on-demand patent dispute with Intertainer Inc.: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=43110&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=43110">IP
     Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple Inc settles
     with &#8216;Think Secret&#8217; blogger over alleged disclosure of trade secrets: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=42953&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=42953">IP
     Law360</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071220-settlement-shutters-thinksecret-eff-its-for-the-best.html">Ars
     Technica</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Wi-LAN files
     patent infringement suit against Dell, Apple, Sony and Intel and others
     over Wi-Fi technology: (<a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=8602">OUT-LAW</a>),</p>

<h3>CANADA: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 23:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Comwave Telecom Inc. opposes Apple's iPhone trade mark application and files its own application citing prior use back to 2004:&nbsp;(<a href="http://www.trademarkblog.ca/apple-launch-iphone-amid-trademark-dispute">Canadian Trademark Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>CANADA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Apple applies for 'iPhone' trade mark in Canada:&nbsp;(<a href="http://www.trademarkblog.ca/apple-launch-iphone-amid-trademark-dispute">Canadian Trademark Blog</a>),</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Colour trade marks</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/259</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/259</guid>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>This scorecard tracks the registrability and fate of colour trade marks (color trademarks) around the world.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>GERMANY: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal
Yellow: (<a href="http://class46.blogspot.com/2008/09/federal-patent-court-colour-trade-mark.html">Class
46</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Erbe and
Canady appeal split judgement in their dispute over patents related to
endoscopic probes and electrosurgical units and trade mark rights in the colour
blue: (<a href="http://www.patracer.com/the_patent_litigation_blo/2008/06/2008-1425-1426.html">Patent Appeal Tracer</a>),</p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p></p><p>Cadbury loses latest round of Australian Federal Court battle over exclusive use
of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (<a href="http://www.australiantrademarkslawblog.com/2008/04/articles/passing-off/cadburys-purple-patch-comes-to-an-end-for-now">Australian Trade Marks Law Blog</a>),
(<a href="http://ipdownunder.com/blake-dawson-battle-over-the-colour-purple-goes-against-cadbury-cadbury-schweppes-pty-limited-v-darrell-lea-chocolate-shops-pty-limited-no-8-2008-fca-470">IP Down Under</a>), (<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/04/chocs-away.html">IPKat</a>), (<a href="http://www.ipfrontline.com/depts/article.asp?id=17969&amp;deptid=4">IPwar&#8217;s</a>),<br />copy of decision - <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2008/470.html">Cadbury Schweppes v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops (No 8) [2008] FCA 470</a><strong></strong></p>

<h3>AUSTRALIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Australian Trade Marks Office suspends three &#8216;Purple&#8217; oppositions pending
final determination of the related passing-off proceedings in the Federal Court: (<a href="http://www.australiantrademarkslawblog.com/2008/02/articles/review-of-trade-marks-office-d/cadbury-purple-to-be-put-on-hold">Australian
Trade Marks Law Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>KENYA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Kenya Appeal Court denies single colour protection in (<a href="http://www.kenyalaw.org/Downloads_Other/BAT v Cut.pdf">British American Tobacco Kenya Ltd ("BAT") v Cut Tobacco Kenya Ltd ("CUTT") </a>) :</p><p>(<a href="http://afro-ip.blogspot.com/2008/01/kenya-appeal-court-denies-single-colour.html">Afro-IP</a>),</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>GERMANY: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p></p><p>Federal Patent Court on trade mark protection for the colour &#8216;red&#8217;.</p><p>"If an abstract colour is used in connection with goods over a longer
period of time in such a way that it creates an interconnection between
the colour and the goods on the one hand and between the colour and the
manufacturer of the goods on the other hand, one can assume, that the
targeted consumers will have become accustomed to recognising the
colour not merely as the colour of the goods but as a sign that
indicates trade origin." <em>[unofficial translation]</em></p><p>(<a href="http://class46.blogspot.com/2008/03/germany-federal-patent-court-on-colour.html">Class
46</a>),</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>NEW ZEALAND: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>New Zealand Court of Appeal refuses Cadbury's attempted trade mark registration for the <em>word </em>PURPLE as it would afford Cadbury a de facto monopoly on use of the word
PURPLE and provide a disincentive to other traders using that word,
even in a descriptive sense, on purple goods - something not within the
scheme of the trade mark regime.</p><p>Copy of <a href="http://jdo.justice.govt.nz/jdo/GetJudgment/?judgmentID=125525">Judgment</a>.</p><p>(<a href="http://www.bellgully.com/newsletters/08corporate/ip_1.asp">Bell Gully</a>), (<a href="http://ipdownunder.com/new-zealand-decision-leaves-cadbury-blue/">IP Down Under</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>LG Group</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/254</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/254</guid>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:43:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p><a href="http://uk.lge.com/index.jhtml">LG Group</a> is a South Korean conglomerate which produces electronics, mobile phones, and petrochemical products and operates subsidiaries like LG Electronicsoperating in over 80 countries. &nbsp;This scorecard tracks intellectual property events involving LG around the globe.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>US Supreme Court ruling on exhaustion worries lots of
people: <em>Quanta Computers v LG Electronics</em>: (<a href="http://ipfinance.blogspot.com/2008/09/us-supreme-court-ruling-on-exhaustion.html">IP
finance</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Patents don&#8217;t run marathons &#8211; they get exhausted: <em>Quanta v LG</em>: (<a href="http://ipdirections.techroadmap.com/2008/08/28/patents-dont-run-marathons-they-get-exhausted">Intellectual Property Directions</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>LG and Quanta settle long-running patent spat concerning downstream
royalty fees for microprocessor chip and chip computer technology: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=67300">Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.managingip.com/Article/2001758/Quanta-and-LG-settle-eight-year-patent-dispute-.html">Managing Intellectual Property</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Summary judgment on hold as LG Electronics Inc. and Quanta Computer Inc. mull deal: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66659">Law360</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Japan-based Atratech Japan Corp files patent infringement suit against flat-screen tv giants including Samsung, Vizio, LG and Mitsubishi claiming infringement of circuitry patent: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=64789">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Typhoon
adds 10 companies, including Apple, Nokia, and LG Electronics, to touch screen
patent suit: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60202&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60202">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/06/25/apple-and-host-of-others-added-to-touchscreen-patent-lawsuit">Ars Technica</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>ITC
dismisses part of patent case between LG Electronics and Whirlpool, ruling two
of Whirlpools patents for refrigerator technology are invalid: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59245&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59245">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:58:00 -0500</h5><p>US Supreme Court reverses CAFC
decision in <em>Quanta v LG Electronics</em>;
method patents exhaustible and sales of products that that do not fully practice an invention can
still trigger exhaustion when the products include essential features
of the patent and the &#8220;reasonable and intended use&#8221; of the product is
to practice to patent:</p><p> (<a href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/06/supreme-court-reverses-cafc-in-quanta.html">Peter
Zura's 271 Patent Blog</a>), (<a href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/06/substantially-embodied-method-claims.html">IP
Updates</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal
Wegner</a>), (<a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/06/supreme-court-d.html">Patently-O</a>),
(<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080609/1104171346.shtml">Techdirt</a>),
(<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/06/exhausted.html">Patent
Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080609-scotus-keeps-lg-from-double-dipping-on-method-patents.html">Ars
Technica</a>), (<a href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/06/quanta-computer.html">Patent
Docs</a>), (<a href="http://aglaw.blogspot.com/2008/06/supreme-court-decides-quanta.html">Agricultural
Law Blog</a>), (<a href="http://www.filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2008/6/9/Todays-opinion-in-Quanta-v-LG-now-available">Filewrapper</a>),
(<a href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-supreme-court-strengthens-patent-exhaustion-doctrine.html">Intellectual
Property Law Blog</a>), (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/06/chipping-away-at-the-quanta-v-lg-electronics-patent-decision.html">Philip
Brooks</a>), (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/06/guest-blog-quanta-computers-inc-v-lg-electronics-inc-the-supreme-court-sets-the-law-on-patent-exhaustion-back-on-track.html">Philip
Brooks</a> guest blog), (<a href="../../blog/352/Exhausted-patents-(II)--Quanta-v-LG-at-the-US-Supreme-Court">IP
ThinkTank</a>), (<a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/06/supreme-court-victory-patent-first-sale-doctrine">Electronic
Frontier Foundation</a>), (<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=855a094e-e435-4017-90b2-acf0993b3144">IAM</a>),
(<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=d7c155b8-f89b-441c-a285-1f89b055fa12">IAM</a>),
(<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/supreme-court-whacks-cafc-over-doctrine.html">IPBiz</a>),
(<a href="http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=227">IPEG</a>), (<a href="http://brokensymmetry.typepad.com/broken_symmetry/2008/06/how-the-quanta.html">Broken
Symmetry</a>), (<a href="http://www.managingip.com/Article/1943620/Supreme-Court-finds-for-Quanta-in-patent-exhaustion-case.html">Managing
Intellectual Property</a>), (<a href="http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2008/06/first-sale-trash-victory-quanta-v-lg.html">Patry
Copyright Blog</a>), (<a href="http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2008/06/09/quantas-end">The Fire of Genius</a>),
(<a href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-supreme-court-strengthens-patent-exhaustion-doctrine.html">Intellectual
Property Law Blog</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58951&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58951">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58710&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58710">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58839&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58839">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal
Wegner</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>LG and&nbsp;identity-security company
L-1 Identity Solution reach deal in iris-recognition technology suit: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54971&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54971">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>LG
Electronics files suit against Whirlpool Corp, claiming infringement of three
patents covering refrigerator components; Whirlpool counterclaims infringement
of its patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54252&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54252">IP Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54867&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54867">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>DTL
Licenses key cell phone patent to LG Electronics: (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/04/dtl-licenses-ke.html">Philip Brooks</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>LCD patent case <em>Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation v LG
Phillips LCD Co Ltd et al</em> transferred to Delaware: (<a href="http://mcsmith.blogs.com/eastern_district_of_texas/2008/03/patent-case-tra.html">EDTexweblog.com</a>),
(<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=52062&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=52062">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>ITC begins investigation into whether numerous companies (including Hitachi, LG, Lite-On, Matsushita, Motorola, Nokia, Pioneer, Samsung, Sanyo, Sharp, Sony, Toshiba) infringed Dr G N Rothschild&rsquo;s LED patents: (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080323-led-patent-dispute-could-block-blu-ray-cellphones-imports.html">Ars Technica</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080321/162722617.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/03/itc-investigate.html">Philip Brooks</a>), (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/03/non-producer-sues-thirty-defendants.html">IPBiz</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>E.Digital sues LG Electronics,
Nikon, Samsung Electronics and others for infringement of patents relating to
flash memory technology: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=49774&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=49774">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Intellect Wireless files patent
infringement complaints against Motorola, LG Electronics, T-Mobile, Sanyo and
others concerning wireless communication features, including paging and caller
ID: (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/03/davids_against_goliaths.html">Patent
Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=49776&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=49776">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>
     Whirlpool files International Trade Commission action against LG over technology used refrigerators:
     (<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/01/whirlpool-files-itc-action-against-lg.html">IPBiz</a>),
     (<a href="http://blog.ipfactor.co.il/2008/01/24/cold-war-heats-up">The IP
     Factor</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=45103&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=45103">IP
     Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>LG, Thomson Inc., Nspire Systems Inc., and Flash Ventures Inc. sued by Ennova Direct for allegedly infringing the company’s flash
     memory drive patent: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=45071&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=45071">IP
     Law360</a>)</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Appellate Courts</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/252</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/252</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:37:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>This scorecard tracks intellectual property decisions of the final appellate courts around the world.  It is designed to track major changes in the law as they move across the globe and to highlight differences in the approach taken in each country.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>INDIA: Kate</h3><h5>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><em>Roche v Cipla</em>: the appellate battle heats up: (<a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/08/roche-vs-cipla-appellate-battle-heats.html">Spicy IP</a>)&nbsp; [Tarceva (Erlotinib)]</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>California appellate court rules on statute of limitations in third party trade secrets misappropriation case: <em>Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v Superior Court (Silvaco Data Systems)</em>: (<a href="http://www.theiplawblog.com/archives/-trade-secrets-third-party-trade-secret-misappropriation-and-the-statute-of-limitations.html">IP Law Blog</a>)</p>

<h3>FRANCE: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Appellate court upholds fine of&nbsp; &#8364;50,000 per day for as long as eBay allows sales of several LVMH perfume brands on top of &#8364;38.6M already awarded to LVMH: (<a href="http://www.counterfeitchic.com/2008/07/euros_and_scents_more_on_lvmh_1.php">Counterfeit Chic</a>) 
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED KINGDOM: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>House of Lords reverses Court of
Appeal and finds Angiotech&#8217;s stent patent valid.&nbsp; In so doing, makes it harder to invalidate based on obviousness: <em>Conor MedSystems v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals</em>: (<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/07/breaking-news-angiotech-appeal-allowed.html">IPKat</a>),
(<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/07/balloons-and-oxymorons-lords-decision.html">IPKat</a>),
(<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=61880&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=61880">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal
Wegner</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: </h3><h5>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:51:00 -0500</h5><p>US Supreme Court reverses CAFC
decision in <em>Quanta v LG Electronics</em>;
method patents exhaustible and sales of products that that do not fully practice an invention can
still trigger exhaustion when the products include essential features
of the patent and the &#8220;reasonable and intended use&#8221; of the product is
to practice to patent:<br /> (<a href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/06/supreme-court-reverses-cafc-in-quanta.html">Peter
Zura's 271 Patent Blog</a>), (<a href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/06/substantially-embodied-method-claims.html">IP
Updates</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal
Wegner</a>), (<a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/06/supreme-court-d.html">Patently-O</a>),
(<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080609/1104171346.shtml">Techdirt</a>),
(<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/06/exhausted.html">Patent
Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080609-scotus-keeps-lg-from-double-dipping-on-method-patents.html">Ars
Technica</a>), (<a href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/06/quanta-computer.html">Patent
Docs</a>), (<a href="http://aglaw.blogspot.com/2008/06/supreme-court-decides-quanta.html">Agricultural
Law Blog</a>), (<a href="http://www.filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2008/6/9/Todays-opinion-in-Quanta-v-LG-now-available">Filewrapper</a>),
(<a href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-supreme-court-strengthens-patent-exhaustion-doctrine.html">Intellectual
Property Law Blog</a>), (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/06/chipping-away-at-the-quanta-v-lg-electronics-patent-decision.html">Philip
Brooks</a>), (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/06/guest-blog-quanta-computers-inc-v-lg-electronics-inc-the-supreme-court-sets-the-law-on-patent-exhaustion-back-on-track.html">Philip
Brooks</a> guest blog), (<a href="../../blog/352/Exhausted-patents-(II)--Quanta-v-LG-at-the-US-Supreme-Court">IP
ThinkTank</a>), (<a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/06/supreme-court-victory-patent-first-sale-doctrine">Electronic
Frontier Foundation</a>), (<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=855a094e-e435-4017-90b2-acf0993b3144">IAM</a>),
(<a href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=d7c155b8-f89b-441c-a285-1f89b055fa12">IAM</a>),
(<a href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/supreme-court-whacks-cafc-over-doctrine.html">IPBiz</a>),
(<a href="http://www.ipeg.eu/blog/?p=227">IPEG</a>), (<a href="http://brokensymmetry.typepad.com/broken_symmetry/2008/06/how-the-quanta.html">Broken
Symmetry</a>), (<a href="http://www.managingip.com/Article/1943620/Supreme-Court-finds-for-Quanta-in-patent-exhaustion-case.html">Managing
Intellectual Property</a>), (<a href="http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2008/06/first-sale-trash-victory-quanta-v-lg.html">Patry
Copyright Blog</a>), (<a href="http://www.thefireofgenius.com/2008/06/09/quantas-end">The Fire of Genius</a>),
(<a href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-supreme-court-strengthens-patent-exhaustion-doctrine.html">Intellectual
Property Law Blog</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58951&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58951">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58710&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58710">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58839&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58839">IP
Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal
Wegner</a>),</p>

<h3>EUROPE: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:48:00 -0500</h5><p>ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot
stop honest comparative advertising: <em>O2
Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited</em>: (<a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=9176">Out-Law</a>), (<a href="http://ice-ip.blogspot.com/2008/06/o2-case-mons-partuit-nascitur-mus.html">Catch
Us If You Can!!!</a>), (<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/06/even-more-on-o2-this-time-trade-mark.html">IPKat</a>),
(<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/06/bubbles-in-luxembourg-now-story-can-be.html">IPKat</a>),
(<a href="http://class46.blogspot.com/2008/06/ecj-rules-in-bubbles-case.html">Class
46</a>), (<a href="http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/06/nice-drop-of-bubbly-from-ecj.html">IPKat</a>),
(<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=59008&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=59008">IP
Law360</a>),<strong></strong></p>

<h3>INDIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Khoday Khoday India Limited vs The Scotch Whisky Association and others (Civil Appeal 4179 of 2008: decided on May 27, 2008)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span>The Supreme Court (Justice Sinha and Justice LS Panta) held in favour of KIL's right to continue being the registered proprietor of the &quot;Peter Scot&quot; mark. One of the factors that influenced the court to hold the way it did was the delay/acquiescence on the part of SWA i.e. although SWA had knowledge about registration of the 'Peter Scot' trademark as early as September 1974, it waited for more than 12 years to move the Registrar for deletion of the said mark. The judge held that &ldquo;We, therefore, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, are of the opinion that action of the respondents is barred under the principles of acquiescence and/ or waiver.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Khoday India Ltd (KIL) started producing 'Peter Scot' whisky in 1968 and got the trademark registered in 1974. After 13 years, the Scotch Whisky Distillers Association (SWDA), an industry body of distillers, blenders and exporters of Scotch whisky, moved the Assistant Registrar Trademarks for cancellation of the registered trademark 'Peter Scot' on the ground of its deceptive similarity to a foreign mark (Scotch whisky).&rdquo;</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/05/indian-supreme-court-on-ip-roll-scotch.html">SpicyIP</a>, see also <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Peter_Scot_wont_be_banned_SC/articleshow/3077991.cms">Times of India</a>; </p>

<h3>INDIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><a href="http://www.judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.aspx?filename=31596">M/s Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. Vs M/s Super Cassette Industries Ltd</a> (Civil Appeal NO. 5114 of 2005, May 16, 2008)</p><p>This case relates to the &#8220;scope&#8221; of compulsory licensing (CL) of sound
recordings under Indian law. <br />PPL is one of the two collecting societies in India. &nbsp;PPL argued that a compulsory license could issue only if the &#8221;work&#8221; had
never been made available to the public earlier. &nbsp;Whereas the radio stations
argued for an almost automatic compulsory licence to be granted upon
request and the only point for consideration was a determination of
&#8220;reasonable royalty&#8221;.</p><p>Justice Sinha (again sitting with Justice
LS Panta) held in favour of the latter interpretation. A second issue
pertained to whether the Act (section 31 (2)) restricted CL
applications to only one party or whether multiple parties could apply.
Here again, although a literal reading of the section made clear that
there could only be one such applicant, Jusice Sinha adopted a
&#8220;purposive&#8221; approach and held in favour of multiple applicants. He
noted in particular that:</p><p>Thanks to <a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/05/indian-supreme-court-on-ip-roll-scotch.html">SpicyIP</a>.</p>

<h3>INDIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><a href="http://www.judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.aspx?filename=31600">Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba  vs TOSIBA Appliances Co. &amp; Ors</a>: Civil Appeal No 3639  of 2008 (decided May 16, 2008)</p>
<p>This case involved an application to rectify the register of trademarks under section 46 on the ground that the mark &ldquo;Toshiba&rdquo; was never &ldquo;used&rdquo; in India (in relation to some goods such as washing machines and spin dryers) and that the proprietor of this mark indulged in &ldquo;trademark trafficking&rdquo;.</p>
<p>The court (Justice Sinha sitting with LS Panta) seemed to suggest that a mere use of the mark in relation to servicing centers (which serviced washing machines imported from abroad) could amount to &ldquo;use&rdquo;. And that a person such as the claimant Appliances who never engaged with washing machines and dryers was not a &ldquo;person aggrieved&rdquo; under section 46 and did not have &ldquo;locus standi&rdquo; to challenge the mark.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/05/indian-supreme-court-on-ip-roll-scotch.html">SpicyIP</a>.<br /> </p>

<h3>CHINA: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Supreme
People&#8217;s Court&#8217;s of China issues judicial explanation on interplay between trade marks, enterprise
names, and other prior existing rights: (<a href="http://chinabusinesslaw.blogspot.com/2008/02/supreme-peoples-courts-2-18-08-judicial.html">China
Business Law Blog</a>),<br /><strong></strong></p>

<h3>INDIA: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>The Supreme Court of India ruled in <a href="http://vlex.com/vid/34111540">Eastern Book Company &amp; Ors vs D.B. Modak &amp; Anr (Civil Appeal No. 6472 of 2004)</a>
that there can be no copyright in the raw text of court
judgments/decisions.&nbsp;</p><p>The basic fact situation is that SCC and SCC &#8211; Online were aggrieved by
individuals who launched a software package entitled "The Laws" and
"Jurix". Allegedly they infringed the copyright of the copy-edited
judgments published by SCC (I figure the reason this was of such great
concern was because the cost of the newer software was about a third of
that of SCC). The said suits were founded, inter alia, on infringement
of copyright and unfair competition.</p><p>The issues in dispute were-</p><p>&#8226;    whether the copy-edited judgments reported by SCC were entitled to copyright protection as derivative works;</p><p>&#8226;    what standard of originality is required by derivative works to evoke that protection;</p><p>&#8226;    and whether the protection would be afforded to the entire text or only certain inputs. </p><p>The Court held as follows-</p><p>A
distinction was made between substantive corrections which required the
application of mind and more technical rectifications. It was held that
technical or clerical alterations in the text like inserting correct
punctuation, providing alternate citations, and the correction of minor
errors although an aid to increased readability are too trivial to be
granted copyright protection.</p><p>However, inputs put in the
original text by the editors with regard to segregating the existing
paragraphs by breaking them into separate paragraphs; adding internal
paragraph numbering; and indicating the Judges who have dissented or
concurred; must be treated differently.</p><p>(<a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/01/are-indian-court-judgments.html">Spicy
IP</a>), (Guest post&nbsp; - <a href="http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2008/01/supreme-court-on-copyrightability-of.html">Spicy
IP</a>), </p>

<h3>JAPAN: Duncan</h3><h5>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:00:00 -0500</h5><p>On November 8, 2007 the Supreme Court of Japan issued a decision where it found 
that [Canon&#8217;s] patents are enforceable against refilled ink cartridges (in this 
case the defendant gathered used Canon ink cartridges from users as a business, 
refilled them with ink and sold them to the public.) &#8230; The Supreme Court stated 
that the doctrine of patent exhaustion, which has long been recognized by the 
court, does not apply to products which are found to have been newly 
"manufactured" by means of fabrication or parts replacement of used authentic 
products. The Supreme Court listed various elements, that can be considered in 
order to determine whether the act of a defendant constitutes "manufacturing" or 
not; including: contents of patented inventions, function and life of products, 
actual conditions of trading, etc. Among other listed elements, the Supreme 
Court admitted that the economical value of a product&#8217;s replaced parts can be 
considered. (The decision of the IP High Court appeared to deny such 
consideration as long as the replaced parts are related to the main elements of 
a patented invention.)</p><p><a href="http://www.andersonmoritomotsune.com/en/info/index11.html">Anderson Mori &amp; Tomotsune</a></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States">Supreme Court of the United States</a></p><p><a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-1237.pdf"><em>Merck KGaA, Petitioner v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd., et al.</em>, 545 U.S. 193 (2005)</a></p><p>The Court held that the use of patented compounds in preclinical
studies is protected under §271(e)(1) at least as long as there is a
reasonable basis to believe that the compound tested could be the
subject of an FDA submission and the experiments will produce the types
of information relevant to an IND or NDA.</p>



				]]></description>
				<author>duncan@duncanbucknell.com (Duncan)</author>
				
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rambus</title>
				<link>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/249</link>
				<guid>http://duncanbucknell.com/scorecards/249</guid>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:52:00 -0500</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[ 
				<p>Rambus is a provider of high-speed interface technology, most notably their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDRAM" title="RDRAM">Rambus Dynamic RAM memory technology</a>, which was intended to replace <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SDRAM" title="SDRAM">SDRAM</a> and challenge <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR_SDRAM" title="DDR SDRAM">DDR SDRAM</a> as the standard <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory" title="Memory">memory</a> used in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer" title="Computer">computers</a>.</p>
				<h2>Contributions</h2>
				
				<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal judge grants summary judgment in Rambus favour on three
of Samsung&#8217;s counterclaims that Rambus&#8217; former in-house counsel misappropriated
confidential information regarding memory chip patents: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=66506">Law360</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Hynix asks court to throw out portions of Rambus&#8217; final
infringement contentions in DRAM patent spat, accusing Rambus of attempting to
add new type of Hynix product: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65962">Law360</a>)</p><p><strong></strong></p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Rambus believes new Samsung DRAM products may infringe patents; asks judge to compel defendants to reveal information on new products: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=65088">Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate</h3><h5>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Judge refuses new trial in DRAM antitrust case between Rambus and Hynix Semiconductors and others: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=63743">Law360</a>), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/07/not_untoward.html">Patent Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/registrations/user_registration?article_id=63959">Law360</a>)
<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Kate Timmins</h3><h5>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Federal judge denies defendants requests for judgment of noninfringement based on claim construction in Rambus ongoing DRAM patent battle against Samsung, Hynix Semiconductor and others: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=62031&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=62031">IP Law360</a>)</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>DC
Circuit overturns FTC <em>Rambus</em> decision
in antitrust litigation over Rambus&#8217; failure to disclose patents to standard
setting body: (<a href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-dc-circuit-overturns-ftc-rambus-decision.html">Intellectual Property Law Blog</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Rambus,
Samsung spar over claims that Rambus&#8217; former in-house counsel misappropriated
confidential information regarding memory chip patents owned by Samsung: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=60830&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=60830">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>FTC seeks en banc review of Rambus
ruling: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=58672&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=58672">IP
Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Rambus seeks supplemental damages award in patent battle with Hynix: (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/05/rambus-injuncti.html">Philip Brooks</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Samsung
dealt another setback in Rambus patent disputes - Judge Ronald M. Whyte denied Samsung's motion for summary judgment that
its memory products did not infringe Rambus&#8217; series of patents in two
cases pending in the U.S. District Court: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54900&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54900">IP Law360</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>CAFC grants
Rambus final victory in semiconductor patent dispute with Samsung: (<a href="http://ip.law360.com/Members/ViewArticlePortion.aspx?Id=54621&amp;ReturnUrl=../secure/ViewArticle.aspx?Id=54621">IP Law360</a> ), (<a href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/to_naught.html">Patent Prospector</a>), (<a href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16338">Hal Wegner</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Duncan</h3><h5>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>Rambus legal victories raise stock price target: (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/05/rambus-legal-vi.html">Philip Brooks</a>),</p>

<h3>UNITED STATES: Anonymous</h3><h5>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0500</h5><p>CAFC
vacates FTC&#8217;s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC
patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (<a href="http://www.infringementupdates.com/2008/04/rambus-defeats.html">Philip Brooks</a>), (<a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080422/144051920.shtml">Techdirt</a>), (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080422-rambus-wins-major-victory-against-the-ftc.html">Ars Techn